The report needs unprejudiced nature and spans on mistaken ends in the most perplexing clash and security challenges in the wake of having not many and inconsistent or one-sided confirmations, it said. As indicated by discoveries of the examination group, Amnesty in its report considered the measures taken by the legislature to guarantee rule of law as human rights infringement.Р”Вespite the fact that the report for the most part needs unbiasedness and contains other principal deficiencies, remembering trouble for gauging confirmations and tolerating the real factors in the nation, a portion of the claims in the report were seen as incompletely solid.Р”В«e that as it may, in contrast to the past quality and sound reports of Amnesty, the current report doesn't meet even the association's own human rights announcing rules and models, the Attorney General office said. In spite of the Attorney General's endeavors to hold discussions with senior authorities of Amnesty in regards to the aftereffects of the examination and the substance of the report, no adequate reaction has been gotten from the association up until now, the workplace said. In the report named 'Past Law Enforcement: Human Rights Violations by Ethiopian Security Forces in Amhara and Oromia,' the association blamed Ethiopian security powers for submitting grave human rights infringement.Р”Р‡ollowing the report, the workplace led its own examination concerning the case in the wake of shaping a group made out of individuals from workplaces of lawyer general of both territorial states, police, higher instructive foundations and common society associations (CSOs). Office of the Federal Attorney General has approached the Amnesty International to audit again the report it gave last May in regards to the human rights circumstances in Ethiopia.

Ebs program ethiopia